![]() ![]() ![]() He had no other job in his life that he did as successfully as writing. He was a figure who wrote in many areas, no matter whether he was competent or not in them. It cannot be denied that Karl Marx was a diligent intellectual, a productive writer who wrote a lot, and an activist who tried to set up revolutionary organizations. Why? This is a strange phenomenon that requires a meaningful and satisfactory explanation. However, Marxism did not end up in this way. Had another theory spectacularly failed as Marxism did, it would have already been thrown into the dump of history. The question is this: why is it that Marxism is still widely accepted and respected in academic and intellectual circles, although it has been theoretically refuted, and political and economic systems built on it collapsed in many cases in the 20 Th century? This question cannot be said to be groundless, unnecessary, and unjust. It is about Marxism, and persistently neglected and ignored in fact, even efforts to raise it are sometimes prevented by either direct and harsh attacks or subtle, cunning, implicit, and indirect pressures. ![]() I think there is an important question that needs to be answered in the world of thought. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |